256 and 512 GB in the performance comparison

256 and 512 GB in the performance comparison

Crucial m4 with 64, 128, 256 and 512 GB in the performance comparison

Having last week's performance, the Samsung SSD-470 have tested at various capacities, follows this week Crucial m4 series. How is the performance scale 64-512 GB? And - how important is it really for the user SSDs offer much performance but also for comparatively much money?. 

Since it is for buyers with smaller budgets who still do not want to miss the short response times close to an SSD, to look at one of the smaller models, a quick drive series. Then come the main operating system and programs on the SSD, while the good old (cheap) hard drive is playing with their rotating magnetic disk to the data port. There's just one catch: It is known takes the performance within a family of SSD with capacity. By implication, this means savers have to settle for less next drive size with lower transfer rates. The watch we have already seen in Samsung's SSDs, the 470 series. But why is that? Unlike hard drives, where rotation speed, data density and number of platters are the relevant parameters,

SSDs have over NAND flash memory modules that communicate over multiple channels with one controller. The larger the flash modules, the higher the capacity, and the more modules are installed, the more channels are used, which improves performance. Both factors together result in capacity and thus performance. Looks like the assembly ultimately decided by the drive manufacturer to bring so the factors size, speed, and, last but not least, the fair market price ratio.